The Url protocol is read only, so it shouldn't be a problem...
On 6/21/11 8:47 AM, "Kathey Marsden" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/21/2011 3:56 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: >> >> Yes, I think you should file a JIRA. For what it's worth, it seems to >> work with a URL like this: >> >> jdbc:derby:https:http://localhost:8080/ipinfo >> >> (Both https and http subsubprotocol names map to URLStorageFactory and >> should be equivalent. I guess it's the code that strips off the >> subsubprotocol that is too aggressive and removes too much if the >> subsubprotocol and the protocol of the URL are identical.) >> > Is it possible to ensure data integrity connecting to a database this way? > > > > iCrossing Privileged and Confidential Information This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information of iCrossing. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
