I'll agree - although it is not really a bone of contention for me personally, the 'unserif-ized' I is much cleaner looking. And though it would be able to be mistaken for a lowercase L - although the lower l in this font is differentiated, it's not immediately obvious - I'd say the cases where confusion could be a real issue aren't common, and easily (?) avoided in a titling font.
Also, the word jumbling is really fun, but it's not quite as easy as you might think. ;) I thought this was interesting: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,511177,00.html On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 15:02 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Martin Sourada > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Nope, I also think the "I" is a bit off in this font. Besides, > "l" > already has a more subtle, but fitting, hint of serifs. > > > > I so completely agree with that! :) > > > That gibberish thing was actually something I learned in a Phonetics > class. Of course I've forgotten what that phenomenon is actually > called. LOL. > > > Fab > > _______________________________________________ > design-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
<<attachment: face-wink.png>>
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
