> > > > Okay, I am assuming then since you haven't indicated otherwise that it > is okay to move forward with the design we'd already worked out, so as > noted above I'll update the ticket with that and take ownership for > getting Ben's final approval on the logo specifically.
Tickets are already open, a while ago, but stop until logo is aproved by Ben. > > > All those tickets are already open (a while ago) and communication > > happens since tickets send a reminder through mail and IRC :) > > It seems a lot of discussion has been happening about this (and other > fudcon-related projects) outside of the ticket system so the automated > ticket comment notifications would not have been much help. (I'm just as > guilty of this as anybody else.) > > Not too much really, with FUDcon India I have been only help, local team has done everything, same with Milan. With Blacksburg we have time, but things have been a bit rush (for logo and after people give their feedback) flyers since Ben want to make a campaing at Vtec fast (a couple in fact). Same with other meetings, everyone is invited as I said, I have only been atent to other tasks since mine where finish or solved by other team members. > Should we be treating the ticket system as the canonical place to have > discussions then? I see discussions scattered across this mailing list, > IRC, other mailing lists, and even Google Docs (I think this is a very > bad habit and is not open source)... it makes it harder for folks to > participate or even just follow along when it's not clear what's going > on and where it's happening. > That's Milans particular issue, even if everyone wanted to dialogue with them and make them use the regular channels, has been almost imposible. I only got Samuele to send a mail to all mail list after he went back from vacations, updates are on the mail list already. The rest has been openly, and I hope Blacksburg be too. > > Do folks get ticket mails for all team tickets or only the tickets > they're cc'ed on? (If the latter that solution could be an issue?) > > What does everybody else think? > > > Be the owner of a ticket doesn't mean that is the only one that can do > > it, once again, that's why we are a team.... right? > > It doesn't. It does mean, however, the person who owns the ticket should > be communicated with so we're all on the same page and don't duplicate > efforts. A ticket-owner doesn't necessarily have to be the one doing the > artwork but I think they should be the one pushing the project forward > and making sure it happens at the very least; if that isn't happening > though, and there's a ticket you're interested in working on, it's good > to reassign the ticket to yourself (after communicating with the ticket > owner) so folks know it's not neglected. We can work as a team when > playing ball, but not everyone can hold the ball at the same time! > > Yeah, that's why I have post everymail list, blogs and more, to get feedback beyond our mail list, tickets and more. Once again, I'm sorry if I made a mistake. > > We do what we can mo :) > > Much appreciated. > > ~m > > > _______________________________________________ > design-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team > -- tatica Maria Gracia Leandro http://www.tatica.org http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:tatica LinuxUser= 440285 GPG Public Key: E1CDCC56
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
