With Anaconda, I do have some usability recommendations. 

I have 4 disk drives.  One of the anaconda requests is to select an 
installation disk.
Suddenly my 4 disks appear, and I must choose one.  But only one of them has 
the free space at a size that I created.  So...  this is a design suggestion.

When each disk drive is shown on the screen, show the free space under its 
identification.
Why is showing the free space being done after I select the drive?
My other user experience is a study if better suggestion.  With the DVD or USB 
image of the DVD,  I feel that Fedora's firstboot function is where the user 
should create the administrator account (aside from root),  and that is when he 
should select the software to install. Software selection should not take place 
in anaconda.  Anaconda is to concern itself only with installation.

When software selection is deferred to firstboot,  The DVD/USB will still be in 
the computer, available with the software that was provided.  But now, the yum 
logic can view the software on the DVD versus the software in the repository. 
Only one installation takes place -- the most recent version.

Here is how it benefits. 
a) Yesterday I did a fresh installation of Fedora 18. After reboot, I had 
800megs of updates to the software that I selected with anaconda.  But with 
firstboot, I would not have to do two installations of applications. One with 
outdated applications provided on the DVD, and the the second with more recent 
version from the repositories.

I have other issues that are technical with anaconda. I have posted these on 
bugzilla. 

Design Team peers, please tell me if my experience and recommendation make 
sense?



Regards  
 Leslie
 Mr. Leslie Satenstein
50 years in Information Technology and going strong.
Yesterday was a good day, today is a better day,
and tomorrow will be even better.mailto:[email protected]
alternative: [email protected] 
SENT FROM MY OPEN SOURCE LINUX SYSTEM.



--- On Thu, 4/4/13, S.Kemter <[email protected]> wrote:

From: S.Kemter <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Design-team] First evaluations after testing Anaconda and Gnome 
installations F19 TC3
To: "Fedora Design Team" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013, 9:53 AM

Hi,


the question is, shall someone who sends his password for an mailing list to 
the same define how to use an desktop environment?

br gnokii




2013/4/4 Leslie S Satenstein <[email protected]>

I believe that the design team should consider the human aspect of linux 
management or linux use. Future designs could profit from saying, "How do I 
make things easy for system management and for general end-users use of the 
system.  

 Leslie
 

--- On Thu, 4/4/13, Onyeibo Oku <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Onyeibo Oku <[email protected]>
Subject: [Design-team] First evaluations after testing Anaconda and Gnome 
installations F19 TC3

To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2013, 3:34 AM


> I thought you may be interested in what I encountered.

> 
> In my evaluation, I got more negative feelings about Gnome than the
> 3.6 version. With 3.6 version, for any program not within the
> favourites bar, it requires 4 mouse clicks to launch.
> 

> With Fedora 19, Gnome 4.x it takes 7 mouse clicks.  By the way, with
> Cinnamon, it is 1 mouse click to open the menu, then slide to the
> appropriate application and click a second time. Done.
> There is a favourites bar as well on the side, and a second favourites

> bar on the bottom panel. 
> 
> For a user of the system. Office, browse, email, some installed
> packages and games, Gnome 4.x is very heavy on using the left mouse
> button. I ended up with tendonitus and had to quit using Gnome, or

> suffer major tendon damage (repetitive action damage).  It  is I that
>
 had the problem and I cannot say that others will have experienced
> similar problems.
> 
> I do have questions about Gnome 4.  What is the difference between
> Favourites bar contents and Frequent items.  If items are used

> frequently, they should replace the items in the favourites bar.
> Frenquent items list is maintained dynamically, and often incorrectly,
> and the other is a static placement.  Did anyone notice that if an

> item is in Frequent side of the collection, it is no longer in the All
> side of the collection. 
> 
> My  major grype with Gnome Desktop is the [:::] (9 sided die)
> launcher.  Why is it not removed from the favourites bar and placed

> next to Activities?  Putting it there would save two clicks on the
> mouse.  With a little logic, it may even be possible to replace
> Activities by this [:::] launcher.
 
> 
> If we look at the Linux users in the world,  the majority of the
> population writes from left to right. (Arabic, Hebrew, and a few other
> languages are right to left). Therefore it made better sense to have

> the favourites bar and the workspace selection on the right side of
> the desktop presentation.  Why do we have to slide from extreme top
> left to extreme right to select an alternate workspace. 
> Ergonomical design and how people use the computer to generate output

> would indicate that there is much to do to improve Gnome.
> 
> I am trying to be positive about identifying and fixing items that
> cause Linux users to shy away from Gnome.
> 
> Regards 

>  Leslie
> 
> Mr. Leslie Satenstein
> 50 years in Information Technology and going strong.
> Yesterday was a good day, today is a better day,
> and
 tomorrow will be even better. mailto:[email protected]
> alternative: [email protected] 

> SENT FROM MY OPEN SOURCE LINUX SYSTEM.


Two things:  
(1) I don't anything about Anaconda in that message
(2) The message has nothing to do with the fedora-design team and
shouldn't be on this mailing list


Thanks for running Fedora, but it might be more productive to send your
desktop evalution report to Gnome developers or fedora Desktop Group.

Regards

Onyeibo



 


_______________________________________________ 
_______________________________________________
design-team mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team

Reply via email to