Hi, Mo I would prefer a IRC hackfest for it, maybe we should set up one. We was in the past really fast with developing ideas and move them forward with this method.
br gnokii 2013/11/14 Máirín Duffy <[email protected]> > On 11/14/2013 06:41 AM, Adam Saunders wrote: > > While we could use different colours to differentiate the products, I > > think sticking with the same/similar shades of blue of the Fedora logo > > could be more effective. It might better illustrate that the products > > are all part of the Fedora project. > > I think this is definitely worth a try, to give each a distinctive look > while keep blue the common color - we can see if it works. > > > The Ford example also sounds good; Ford cars all have a common logo with > > differentiating sublogos. However, there can be striking differences > > between those sublogos: the Ford Mustang's is a galloping stallion, > > while the Ford Taurus's is a sharp word mark. While the Starbucks visual > > brand language has many clear commonalities, Ford automobile sublogos > > look very different from each other. > > Well, the galloping stallion is actually a mark / badge / insignia, not > the logo. On the website and official brochures (I can speak to the > latter because I own a Ford and was recently at the dealer for a tune up > :) ) the 'MUSTANG' logo is written out in the same font as the other > cars' logos. But I am glad you pointed that out because that might be a > point of confusion in our analogy; we might need to find a better one > when explaining this. > > We definitely want clear commonalities between any marks or visual > identity graphics we create for the different products! > > > I guess my point is: I think we should add these questions to the list > > to ask the working groups: > > > > (5) To what extent is your product different from > > the other products in the Fedora.next initiative? > > > > (6) To what extent is your product similar to the other > > products in the Fedora.next initiative? > > > > These may be somewhat trivial-sounding questions, but getting a sense of > > how the working groups see their product in relation to the other > > Fedora.next products could help to better establish a common branding > > framework. > > This is a good point; I think though, we'll probably find the > differences clear through the answers to their other questions maybe? > Mainly, the 'what problem does it solve' question should differentiate > them enough do you think? > > ~m > > _______________________________________________ > design-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team > -- make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
