Hi,
2013/12/4 Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> > Hi all, > > I have started to work a little more on nuancier. > With the changes that are in the current git, users may log in (via FAS), > upload > their wallpaper with a corresponding name, license and author (in case the > author is not the submitter). > When they upload, I restrict the content using the filename (extension), > the > mime type of the file and I check for a minimal width (1600px) and height > (1200px). > upload should be possible without FAS, we had because of that a discussion on F18. Its just that, we need a valid mail address > > Admins can then moderate all the candidates and they must justify when > they deny > a candidate. > Maybe we could trigger the badge at this stage, when the wallpaper gets > accepted. > yes badge should only awarded when the submission is taken, we had this time a lot of submissions with low quality, think that came as they wanted a badge :( > > The elections are now time-based (so no-one needs to stay awake until the > middle > of the night to press the toggle button). > yeah > > Questions: > - What more is needed when uploading a picture? > - Other ideas in general? > - Could we come up with a list of extensions accepted? (I have jpeg, jpg, > png, > svg atm and I check them lower case, so JPEG will pass) > - Similarly could we come up with a list of MIME types for images that we > would > accept? (Atm I have only: 'image/jpeg', 'image/jpg', 'image/png') > > Finally, I have the same restrictions for contributing (uploading a > wallpaper) > and for voting. These are: having an account on FAS, have signed the CLA, > being > in at least one more group than CLA. > I realize that this is already a change from the current procedure, but I > find > it unfair that people that submit a wallpaper cannot vote for themselves. > So I > would either stick with these restrictions or open the votes to people > that are > in no other group than CLA. > now, we want to prevent that people just signing up for this vote. I could live with an extra group where submitters end up an can vote but open it totally to the public I think is not a good idea. We already made the process more open br gnokii > > Thoughts on all this? > > Cheers, > Pierre > _______________________________________________ > design-team mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team -- make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
