Hi,
my list of things I located today in testing Nuancier - is the folder where the submissions end up a concern for the admin? - make * for mandatory fields - add time field for when submission opens - add "link to the original author" field br gnokii 2013/12/20 S.Kemter <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I worked a little bit on the design for the front page and I came up with > an idea: > > http://img.susepaste.org/68449823 > > @Ryan & Mizmo do you have an idea how to put an slideshow on top of the > monitor? > > > br gnokii > > > 2013/12/18 Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:24:12PM +0100, S.Kemter wrote: >> > 2013/12/18 Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> >> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:33:17PM +0100, S.Kemter wrote: >> > > 2013/12/18 Pierre-Yves Chibon <[email protected]> >> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:40:44PM +0100, S.Kemter wrote: >> > > > First of all, I am still not convinced to get the >> pressure >> > back to >> > > have an >> > > > FAS account for an submission, we agreed for F19 that >> that >> > would be >> > > not >> > > > necessary but we had no way arround as you need one >> for the >> > wiki. >> > > So there >> > > > was only two who used the way to send me something and >> I >> > submitted >> > > it to >> > > > the wiki. >> > > >> > > Well you can still submit the file in the name of someone >> else. >> > > >> > > yeah but you are not the author, so how shall I notice that >> then? >> > >> > So we actually want to consider the case where: >> > * Joe takes a pictures and puts it on flicker under CC-BY-SA >> > * Jane sees the picture and likes it a lot >> > * Jane wants to submit it to nuancier >> > * Jane does not want to create a FAS account >> > * Jane asks Dave to upload the picture taken by Joe for her >> > >> > ?? >> > >> > wowowow, just make it simple possible to submit without FAS account. >> For >> > F19 we had already the case that somebody submitted the work of >> somebody >> > else with another license. You always question me, why I have to >> > disqualify if its not correct licensed eg but in this case the author >> > changed the license after an conversation. >> >> I always asked when you spoke about 'ugly' submissions; brand, people, >> wrong >> license, stolen artwork are all fine reasons to reject a submission ;-) >> >> Anyway, back on the subject, would requiring a OpenID be ok? >> If so, I'll see what I can do to port nuancier to just require an OpenID. >> yahoo, google, FAS all provide OpenID login, but it makes things a little >> more >> tricky to store the submitter. >> >> > Then the titles becomes "Unicorn rocks pandas-by-mizmo"? And we >> display >> > it as >> > such? >> > >> > isnt there a difference between file name and name? >> >> There is on the one side the file name which indeed incoporate the >> submitter's >> name. On the other side there is the title (which used to be 'Name') >> which is >> just the title of the artwork, so can be set to anything. >> >> And when looking into this I obviously found a bug ^^. >> >> I was checking that filename and title are unique per election but in >> fact it's >> both (filename and title) that must be unique for an election. >> So as long as you and I provide different filename, we may use the same >> title. >> (Fixed and deployed) >> >> Ok, so beside the login question which I'm going to look into, is there >> anything >> else? >> >> >> Thanks for your feedbacks :) >> >> Pierre >> > > > > -- > make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;) > -- make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
