Hi Drew, *
drew schrieb:
Hi,
Well, it's only fair that I ask...
:-) Thanks for thinking at asking ;-)
Have been working on a Holiday Greeting Card video for LibreOffice.
I saw the links you provided, but didn't manage to have a look at the
video until yesterday: Thanks for your work!
So of course that means using the logo(s).
(Yes, I know life would be easier if I didn't ask)
http://oucv.org/libreoffice/tdf-holiday-trailer.ogv.tar.gz
If you grab that file and open the video contained within you will see
the first use of the logo - in this case the inverse document icon - I
suppose this is OK.
In my eyes it is nearly OK - even with the green light it stands on it's
own and stays visible and recognizable.
Perhaps you could have a bit more room between the symbol and the text
below it - the distance to the "G" is smaller than half the width of the
symbol.
The green light is inside the white space area too, but if Christoph
doesn't object, I'd like to allow this as an exception (we should add
"single case decision for special cases" to the wiki page [1]).
There is also use of the full contemporary Logo, and here I am
overlaying a background image...but I think this is OK here?
The background image is meant to be a background - just structured like
linen. It's color is neither too dark for the colored logo, nor one of
our accent colors (in fact it is quite near to the "Yellow 4" from our
color scheme).
Even if the background becomes slightly darker behind the last two
characters of LibreOffice, I think discrimination is still enough, so
it's OK too.
CC'ing Christoph for his opinion.
Here are two examples of what I'm doing there:
http://oucv.org/libreoffice/shaw.png
http://oucv.org/libreoffice/emmerson.png
Thanks much,
Best regards
Bernhard
[1]: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
