Hi, all new friends,
I agree with Nik. On the other hand, I'm very impressed with he work that has been done in such a short time. I'm new here and I've followed this mailing list for a while to get an idea of how the collaboration is done. A short presentation: I'm a designer and project manager. I work on Mac, Windows and Linux, but my major platform is design. I've never participated in open source development before, but I've worked with open source scripts/programs in many projects for years. i would be happy if a can contribute and help. Rick > > In my opinion when the Community branding /does/ arrive, it should be a > MAJOR OVERHAUL. Not just a /slight change/ to the existing logo's > composition. This logo was made for The Document Foundation, where a > "document" makes sense as a logo, but LibreOffice is a SUITE of software, > not just a document. The Community logo should take that step and address > this issue. (maybe bad example, but MSO's "flower" is a symbol of the 4 main > applications comprising that suite, not trying to turn us into them, just > saying that by comparison we seem to be "missing the bigger picture" > metaphorically). > > For the mean time, the document will do, but that doesn't mean to say that > the logo, exactly as it was originally created, should remain unchanged > until the Community Branding arrives does it? > Because that is a long way away. Ohhhhhh, I argue for this but I don't know > if it means anything to anyone else. If I'm the only one that sees it this > way I'll stop and turn my attention elsewhere. > Branding is important to me, but I know it's not the only thing we do. > > -Nik > > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
