Hi,

One thing about palette: it should use one color 10 different modes, not 8.
Then its better to use, compare:
1. http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/1/1b/Rpalette.png(some
libreoffice colors with 10 different color mods, with little mods)
2. 8 color mods: http://ubuntuone.com/p/aFj/ very unbalanced.

Hillar

2011/3/5 Bernhard Dippold <[email protected]>

> Hi Christoph,
>
> just a short note on the names...
>
> Christoph Noack schrieb:
>
>> Hi Bernhard, all!
>>
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 02.03.2011, 23:00 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Dippold:
>> [...]
>>
>>> In the LibO case, I'd go for "adding Libre" - you take?
>>>> (+1/-1/0)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Therefore I vote with +1.
>>>
>>> But I'd prefer "LibreGreen 1" over "Libre Green 1", because without
>>> the space "LibreGreen" is a name, while in "Libre Green" libre can
>>> be understood as descriptive adjective.
>>>
>>
>> True, but removing the whitespace makes it less readable ...
>>
>
> I don't think this is an important issue, as it should be a descriptive
> name rather than a color accompanied by a leading adjective and a following
> number.
>
> We decided to call our product LibreOffice, even if Google finds more
> "Libre Office" than "LibreOffice", this seems to be quite similar. I think
> it is inconsistent and a neglected marketing chance, if we add a space
> between "Libre" and the color.
>
> But I'm not an UX-expert, so I have to believe you that people will not be
> able to understand LibreGreen as easy as Libre Green.
>
>  originally, we had this kind of naming, but since we added more
>> colors, it became an issue to me - when I've created the palettes for
>> LibreOffice and Inkscape.
>> http://luxate.blogspot.com/2010/10/united-colors-of-liberty.html
>>
>
> Looking at these colors, I find out, that I like the previous color names
> better than the present ones:
>
> Orange is not really orange - Marron has been more exact.
>
> Yellow is not yellow at all - Ocher might be the right description.
>
>>
>>  To be consistent, we should use "LibreGreen Accent" instead of
>>> "Green Accent" - OpenGrok shows the latter.
>>>
>>
>> OpenGrok is okay, since I asked for that name when it got integrated
>> ;-)
>>
>
> But the other colors seems to have been integrated with "Libre" - did you
> do this on purpose?
>
>
> http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/extras/extras/source/palettes/libreoffice.soc
>
> The Inkscape palette I use doesn't contain any "Libre", so they are
> different.
>
> But in future all the palettes (LibO, Inkscape, GIMP) will use the same
> naming... :-)
>
>>
>>  [...]
>>>>
>>>> 2. The gray shades are missing in the table - these are not
>>>> necessarily part of the official branding palette, but very
>>>> helpful when working on documents (rationale: changing palettes
>>>> in LibO is still time consuming, so the basic colors should be
>>>> included).
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we should define two grey values as "LibreGrey" (or
>>> "LibreGray"). One should be the grey tone of the lighter part in
>>> the greyscale logo. As it is the equivalent to "LibreGreen" (as
>>> official LibO color "LibreGreen 1" might be called this way IMHO),
>>> I'd call it "LibreGrey 1".
>>>
>>
>> The name "Green 1" has some historic reasons, since - originally -
>> it was the darkest green. The "Green 0" was some mysterious
>> workaround to keep the name, since it already had been used
>> extensively. Thus, the number marks the "intensity" of the color.
>>
>> To provide additional information, I've used the "Comment" section
>> in the spreadsheet table. If you look at the Inkscape palette, hover
>> the "LibreGreen 1" item and Inkscape will show "LibreGreen 1
>> (LibreOffice Main Color)".
>>
>
> Here it shows "Green 1 (LibreOffice Main Color)".
>
> We should use this feature for the official grey too.
>
>>
>> So for such kind of information, I propose to keep this kind of
>> naming scheme.[...]
>>
>>
>>  If we include the basic colors in the palette, more grey values are
>>> as important as the main colors.
>>>
>>
>> True, that's what I've suggested - the LibreOffice color palette
>> available in the wiki does feature all these gray values; equally to
>> the Inkscape palette.
>>
>
> I've been wondering, if we should add plain colors (red, green, blue,
> yellow, orange, violet) to the LibO palette too, because they might be used
> for marking etc. We don't have red at all...
>
> But on the other hand they don't fit with the LibreOffice colors, so I'd
> avoid such a mixture.
>
> What do you think?
>
>  I'll add the source code at the end of the mail
>> - for easier reference.
>> [...]
>>
>
> I don't know if a break is allowed in an .soc file, if so, I'd add one
> behind the first entry: This would lead to better readability, as every
> definition is shown in it's own line.
>
> And didn't you vote for adding "Libre"? (Even if you want to keep it as
> single word...)
>
> If we agree on the dark grey , I'd like to add "(LibreOffice Color)" or
> "LibreGrey 1" (or something similar) to the name.
>
> And one more point:
>
> While the default UI language is "English (USA)" the standard color palette
> as well as your proposal use the British English spelling "Gray" instead of
> "Grey".
>
> Best regards
>
> Bernhard
>
>
>
>
>> === LibreOffice_Initial-Branding-Colors.soc ===
>>
>> <ooo:color-table> <draw:color draw:name="Black"
>> draw:color="#000000"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 90%"
>> draw:color="#1A1A1A"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 80%"
>> draw:color="#333333"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 70%"
>> draw:color="#4D4D4D"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 60%"
>> draw:color="#666666"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 50%"
>> draw:color="#808080"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 40%"
>> draw:color="#999999"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 30%"
>> draw:color="#B3B3B3"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 20%"
>> draw:color="#CCCCCC"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 10%"
>> draw:color="#E6E6E6"/> <draw:color draw:name="Gray 5%"
>> draw:color="#F2F2F2"/> <draw:color draw:name="White"
>> draw:color="#FFFFFF"/> <draw:color draw:name="Green 0"
>> draw:color="#106802"/> <draw:color draw:name="Green 1 (LibreOffice
>> Main Color)" draw:color="#18A303"/> <draw:color draw:name="Green 2"
>> draw:color="#43C330"/> <draw:color draw:name="Green 3"
>> draw:color="#92E285"/> <draw:color draw:name="Green 4"
>> draw:color="#CCF4C6"/> <draw:color draw:name="Blue 0"
>> draw:color="#023F62"/> <draw:color draw:name="Blue 1"
>> draw:color="#0369A3"/> <draw:color draw:name="Blue 2"
>> draw:color="#1C99E0"/> <draw:color draw:name="Blue 3"
>> draw:color="#63BBEE"/> <draw:color draw:name="Blue 4"
>> draw:color="#AADCF7"/> <draw:color draw:name="Orange 0"
>> draw:color="#622502"/> <draw:color draw:name="Orange 1"
>> draw:color="#A33E03"/> <draw:color draw:name="Orange 2"
>> draw:color="#D36118"/> <draw:color draw:name="Orange 3"
>> draw:color="#F09E6F"/> <draw:color draw:name="Orange 4"
>> draw:color="#F9CFB5"/> <draw:color draw:name="Purple 0"
>> draw:color="#530260"/> <draw:color draw:name="Purple 1"
>> draw:color="#8E03A3"/> <draw:color draw:name="Purple 2"
>> draw:color="#C254D2"/> <draw:color draw:name="Purple 3"
>> draw:color="#DC85E9"/> <draw:color draw:name="Purple 4"
>> draw:color="#F2CBF8"/> <draw:color draw:name="Yellow 0"
>> draw:color="#876900"/> <draw:color draw:name="Yellow 1"
>> draw:color="#C99C00"/> <draw:color draw:name="Yellow 2"
>> draw:color="#E9B913"/> <draw:color draw:name="Yellow 3"
>> draw:color="#F5CE53"/> <draw:color draw:name="Yellow 4"
>> draw:color="#FDE9A9"/> <draw:color draw:name="Green Accent"
>> draw:color="#2CEE0E"/> <draw:color draw:name="Blue Accent"
>> draw:color="#00A0FC"/> <draw:color draw:name="Orange Accent"
>> draw:color="#FC5C00"/> <draw:color draw:name="Purple Accent"
>> draw:color="#E327FF"/> <draw:color draw:name="Yellow Accent"
>> draw:color="#FFD74C"/> </ooo:color-table>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
>

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to