Hi,
I don't get the svg problem.
Is this as it must be?: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Same.png
This is how the inkscape shows it to me.

SVG: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Same.svg Firefox have some
problem showing it correctly, IE shows it right.
Maybe there is problem with Illustrator which don't handle SVG correctly?

Hillar

2011/3/23 Nik <[email protected]>

> Hi Crew!
>
> I've just spent several hours trying to solve this problem and delved
> deeper into transparency settings in vectors files than I knew existed (it
> gets VERY deep) and created more than 10 files which produce varying degrees
> of failed transparency. I'll keep at this tomorrow, but I've updated the
> problem section with the problematic SVG as well as a link to a pristine
> Illustrator file;
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Motif#Alpha_problem
>
> And in answer to Christopher, I wouldn't usually burden this list with
> proprietary formats like PSD and AI but this is a special circumstance.
> Besides, the /tool/ isn't important, it's the contribution that counts, not
> the vendor. I'm pretty sure the developers wouldn't turn down a script
> written using Aptana rather than Eclipse =)
>
>
> On 3/23/2011 11:23 AM, Rob Cummings wrote:
>
>> There's a spray can tool in Inkscape that allows you to paint a pattern
>> composed of a vector shape. You can change the parameters to randomize
>> placement, scale, rotation, etc. Using one shiny new green-gadient
>> triangle
>> as the original pattern, it's actually quite simple to reproduce the
>> scatter
>> pattern. The only thing it doesn't do is randomize the alpha, though the
>> original pattern shape can use a gradient with transparency values.  Using
>> shapes with different overall alpha values could get us what we want.
>>
> Hi Rob,
> I used similar tools in Illustrator to begin with, but to achieve a
> harmonic result, it requires a lot of manual shifting and adjusting, it
> actually took a lot of time to achieve a composition that sat well
> (balanced+organic). In any case, the randomizing of Alpha is the important
> part and the only problematic part so far. The vectors and placement are
> intact, as are the shapes/colours/scale/rotation. Hopefully it won't come to
> having to re-create the composition. I'll keep at it, if all else fails, I
> can provide the vectors alone without alpha and we can layer them (in a way
> that would be less effective than the current screening alpha, but is better
> than nothing). Thanks for helping with this! =)
>
>> I can try a couple things, but it won't be until tomorrow morning (eastern
>> US time).
>>
>> Rob
>>
> -Nik
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
>
>

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to