I fully agree with the gallery idea, this is the best solution, because with that actually can see what is best, but as it is debated whether Microsoft is losing customers, and he knows how they will be returned because there designers decide how the program looks, rather than developers, who are paid to do as they are told, they do not care if toolbar does not fit the windows, MS is extra just because, and here the main problem is just that, so much debate about whether this bar that stands out from the system. And to ask customers taht say what it is better, They do not care if ribbon deviate from the system, it is important that the program is good and special for us because nobody will be offended if on the new version ubuntu found a single program that sow their face with opportunities. After all, all is a habit.
I fully agree with the gallery idea. 2011/6/20 Björn Balazs <b...@lazs.de> > Hi all, > > I am a little unsatisfied with the amount of individual threads going into > the direction of: "We need a new interface for LibreOffice - and it needs > to > look linke this...". > > This is a Free Software Project. As a design team, we will not need to > convince ourselves about this need to change the GUI (we all agree on > that), > we will need to convince the people actually doing (and financing) it - the > developers and the companies paying them. > > We will obviously not be able to do this by starting the same discussion > all > over and over again (e.g. Ribbon discussion). To convince the sponsors of > new > software code, we should never argue about personal opinions. A conflict in > personal opinion is not solvable. And developers and managers of sponsoring > companies willl have personal opinions as well. These kind of conflicts > will > predicitably end with those parts of the suggestions beeing realised that > the > sponsors like. This again will not satisfy anyone in the end (not us, not > the > users and not the sponsors). > > So, how can we make this more productive? > > Ideas are good, visualisations are even better. So let us find a way to not > comment on these, but to collect them with the goal of easy comparision > with > eachother. A gallary of ideas and visualisations of the future LibO. > > We should then try to extract the dimensions these ideas differ on. Knowing > these we can then again use user-centric methodologies to have the users > decide about what they like. > > With this data we will have much less trouble to convince the code-sponsors > to go into a certain direction. > > So - the main point I am argueing for is a gallery of interface ideas. Easy > to compare and on one spot. What do you think about this? > > Best, > Björn > > -- > Voluntary Open Source Usability: http://www.OpenUsability.org > Commercial Open Source Usability: http://www.OpenSource-Usability-Labs.com > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- Regards, Budislav -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
