(comments in-line)

2011/10/15 satchitb <[email protected]>
<snip>

> 3. Paste Special must go. Regular Paste works with plain and rich text,
> images and all other types. If not, it should.
>

Paste special is used when you copy rich text format and want to paste
unformatted text to avoid formatting problems, for example (typically when
copying from a web page), or when you copy an object and want to paste a
picture of this object instead. I use Ctrl-Shift-V, but menu oriented people
will need that entry


> 4. AutoText should be moved to either AutoCorrect Options under Tools, or
> Fields under Inset.
>

Even is sometimes the results are similar, AutoText is a completely
different beast, not related with autocorrect nor fields: autotext inserts
"blocks of document", autocorrect change small pieces of text and fields
insert automated "live" content.

<snip>

>
> D. Insert:
> 1. Section should be removed. Manual editing with Headings works fine to
> delineate sections.
>

Headings has nothing to do with "sections": section can be used, for
example, to have on the same page text without columns and text with
columns: typical format for scientific papers. As a matter of fact I'll
eliminate the "Insert columns" entry instead, because its results can be
quite confusing (to change the page style or to introduce a section,
depending on the situation) if the user do not know what Writer is doing...
and most users do not know what Writer is doing.


> 3. Consider Cross-References into Index.
>

Why?
 <snip>

> 10. The option File should be removed. I do not believe any users attach
> files which are not covered in Picture, Sound and Video, etc to documents.
>

As a matter of fact, it is quite useful when you want to add some text
created on a different document and you do not want to use master documents
just to merge two files.


> <snip>
>
> G. Tools:
> 1. Consider bundling Outline Numbering and Line Numbering with Bullets and
> Numbering under Format.
>

All three are completely different, even if they *seem* similar. I'm afraid
that the only way to make this more clear is to completely redesign the
whole thing from scratch...


>
> LibreOffice Writer, while being the most feature-rich word processor on
> Linux, is also often slow and accused of being disorganised and inelegant.
> Even keeping to the existing look, a lot can be done to streamline its
> menus
> and functions.
>

Changing defaults! :)
Cheers
Ricardo

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to