----- Mail original ----- > De: "Andrew Pullins" <[email protected]> > Hello, > > So I just read all of the IRC chat log. I do not see the problem with > having a "Document Colors" section in addition to "Custom Colors".
I'm also convinced it would be a nice feature to have, but the drawback would be increasing complexity of the interface and complexity of implementation (I said "performance" on IRC which is only part of the problem). I think we all agree that we need a solution to re-use a color that is used in the document and that is not present in the palette. IMHO, in most cases, the user wants to re-use a color of an element of the document that he actually sees. I the mockup I suggested, you have to select the element, click "other", add this color to your palette, and then apply it. It's sub-optimal, but it's rather easy to implement and it's already a significant improvement over the current situation. Adding an "eye dropper", as suggested, would probably be a good idea, but it can be implemented later. I'm really convinced that we should have a realistic approach so that we can have quickly in the code changes that make a bit difference. Cheers, Camille -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
