HI *, On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Kingswells Computercraft <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is the main LO icon I'm talking about; it's not so much what's wrong > with it, so much as what it lacks - as I stated in my original message:
I don't think it is our main Logo that is lacking something - simple is beautiful :-) - but of course we could need some additional artwork, like a mascot character.. See http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04402.html or http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03213.html for details. http://naplatno.cz/libocon2011-days-1-2/content/DSC_1069_large.html I'd love to have a friendly mascot-character But I don't think that our main logo needs fancy stuff - as mentioned earlier the simplicitly makes it suitable for easy printing, makes it easily recognizable. If it was a logo that relied on color, you couldn't use any background you like, and of course printing would be either much more expensive or would use monochrome variant anyway... ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
