I'm sure lot of people use it. In my previous job, we made every online documentation like this (with WORD), I didn't achieve to made them understand a wiki would be better, for design, usability, maintainability... This function is far from perfect but I'm sure it's used a lot. Then the choice between writer.IE.Netscape isn't useful at all for me...
Kévin 2012/11/5 Jay Lozier <[email protected]> > On 11/05/2012 08:18 AM, Kévin PEIGNOT wrote: > > Hi Rob, Jay > > That's right, HTML export produce very, very bad HTML product (just try to > export a white page...) and that exporting styles to a separated CSS file > (or at list a separated section) would be better. Then according this > option, I added this one in the whiteboard > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Analyses/Global_Options#Load.2FSave > > Kévin > > I agree that exporting to html is not a very useful option partly because > it does not (can not?) produce easily maintainable html code. The fact the > code probably works is less important than that maintaining/editing the > code is very difficult. > > Should we ask on the users list if anyone uses export to html and if so > what is their opinion? > > Jay > > > 2012/11/5 Jay Lozier <[email protected]> > >> On 11/04/2012 04:14 PM, Rob Snelders wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The export-option in the options-dialog -> Load/Save -> >>> HTML-compatibility states that you can save for LibreOffice Writer, >>> Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator. Looking at the code that states >>> Netscape 4-compatibility. >>> But has this still any value? As the browsers are for basic HTML >>> compatible for some years. I think that the Netscape output also works in >>> Internet Explorer. >>> If it still has value then the name netscape navigator should change as >>> less and less people know what Netscape is. >>> >>> This bug triggerd the question: >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56726 >>> >>> -- >>> Greetings, >>> Rob Snelders >>> >>> Rob, >> >> >From the few times I exported as html, I noticed the html produced >> appeared to be fairly standard html 4.01. The main problem I noticed is >> that all the styles are embedded in the html. Note, I believe this is legal >> html, if now considered bad practice The export modules do not produce a >> CSS page. This makes the resulting html, IMHO, very difficult to maintain. >> >> You can check your html at http://validator.w3.org/ >> >> I find I prefer to save the text as txt file then cut and then directly >> create the html page(s) and CSS pages I need. >> >> -- >> Jay Lozier >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> -- >> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] >> Problems? >> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ >> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette >> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ >> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be >> deleted >> >> > > > -- > Jay [email protected] > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
