Hello Teo, Le Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:41:38 -0800 (PST), Teo91 <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote > > What do people think about the download experience of LibreOffice? > > How can it be improved? Any > > particular idea besides a graphical redesign itself? > > I think there should be a clear distinction between early-adopters and > rock-solid LO releases. > Lots of users just download the more recent version (e.g. 4.1.0) and > then claim it's buggy: they simply don't know why there are two > versions. It would be really useful have a tooltip/little > description/symbol who says something like: > > ( ✓) LibreOffice 4.0.6 is our conservative and rock-solid version > for professional users. > > (!) LibreOffice 4.1.3 is our latest, feature rich version for > early-adopters and casual users. > Well I don't agree on the order of the download nor on what it suggests, but I like the wording. The 4.1.3 (esp. when it comes to the x.x.3) is already very stable and production ready. The 4.0.6 is the one at the end of the support line so we don't want to put that first. Best, Charles. > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Website-Redesign-Assessing-the-Download-experience-tp4082534p4083526.html > Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Charles-H. Schulz Co-founder, The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint Mobile Number: +33 (0)6 98 65 54 24. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
