Hi Mirek,
I and Jay agreed that the icons look much clearer without the candy-ish
fill, especially the "T" and the omega. Currently, the icons bold,
italic and underlined in master use the Gnome 2.20 style, with a rather
flat gradient and highlights. Here's a SVG comparing the different
versions: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12598822/bold%20icon.svg
I didn't attend the last two hangouts, so we didn't make a decision
regarding the text icon style, but I could attend next week.
Regarding the icon size, is it really that bad if a few icons make use
of the 1 px margin? E.g. the text lines in the bullets and numbering
icons look too slim if one leaves the margin untouched.
Since we want to get rid of tango-testing and remove it after rescuing
all icons good enough for tango, I don't think it's a good idea to add
another theme. Many Gnome apps now use the -symbolic set, so the
inconsistency won't be that apparent.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
