Hello Mike, On 19 janvier 2015 23:54:46 CET, Mike Hall <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks for the response Charles - various comments below... > >On 18/01/15 13:49, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: >> Hello again Mike, >> >> Le dimanche 18 janvier 2015 à 11:28 +0000, Mike Hall a écrit : >>> *Redesign of Help > Send Feedback page* >>> The objective is to make users feel more welcome, to show them their >>> responsibilities and make it easier for them to find relevant help. >As a >>> result, they may be more willing to provide feedback and perhaps to >>> contribute more to the project. >>> >>> A draft redesign is at: >>> www.onepoyle.net/User_Role_and_Feedback.htm >[snip] >>> In theory yes (the design team has a whole process for this, but as >I am >>> part of the website team we can make the edits asap when we reach a >>> consensus. So let's work with what we have. >>> >>> So far: I love what you did. Just a few ancillary comments. >>> First line, "if you wish to become more involved" part: let's put >this >>> as a direct link to this page: >>> http://www.libreoffice.org/community/get-involved/ >Done >>> >>> In the "Users have responsibilities" bullet list, the last comment >about >>> telling other people about LibreOffice, we could at some point >(maybe >>> not now) point to a simple repository of web banners, buttons, and >of >>> course the "What's LibreOffice" page >>> (http://www.libreoffice.org/discover/libreoffice/) >That link is also the one for the first bullet point. Agree it would be > >good for this bullet to be a link too, but I couldn't think what. >Agree, >later addition. >>> >>> I'd like to suggest changing the menu entry 'Send Feedback' to >something >>> reflecting the intent of the edited page. 'User Role & Feedback...' >is >>> the best I've come up with, but there is almost certainly something >much >>> better. 24 characters maximum? >> Not sure. "User Role" is somewhat confusing. I'd leave it as it is, >> after all the text you have already added up is quite clear? >OK >> >>> Would it be a good thing to add the contents of the web page to LO >Help >>> in due course? It would then be available offline and be translated. >> I'm not sure exactly if I understand your correctly, do you mean to >say >> we should have these pointers on the About LibreOffice pop up window >> inside the office suite? I would really like to have that; but we >would >> need to design it well, not just copy and past the contents of the >page. >> Another option would be to have it on first launch or something. >I meant something prominent on the pages you get when you press F1. >Your >suggested alternatives are interesting as well. Another possibility >would be to have them on the page you get when you first open LO >without >an open file. There's plenty of room >below the 'Create:' group and it >seems as if it might be an obvious place >to put it. I'd like to mull > this over for a few days - it's > independent of the rest. Happy to do > some basic design work in due course > if you like.
I have thought about it again but we need the input of the design team at this stage. I think we ought to go along your original idea (focusing onthe embedded help); we may want to do something similar, maybe more graphical and richer in content when the user starts LibreOffice on the first time or during the installation. >>> I'm thinking of a logo for the page reflecting "Users first" but I'm >not >>> a graphics designer. Any takers? >>> >>> What's all this about "User's First"? Colleagues working on LO do so >for >>> a wide variety of understandable personal reasons. However, without >a >>> substantial number of otherwise unengaged users, the project would >be >>> likely to wither and die. Thus users are the essence of why the >project >>> exists >> hmm... er. no. The project exists because people are happy to work on >it >> or are paid to work on it. Never because of users. It is really an >> important distinction to have, although it is not overly helpful to >> claim it everywhere; contributors work on whatever pleases them, but >> hardly never for users. Implying this would be highly misleading >(that's >> what we learned during those ten years I was telling you about). >I understand where you are coming from and I understand the way >development proceeds. It would be good to push the culture just a >little >towards a little more QA and a little less new features and in fact >there has been a shift in that direction (eg MABs). certainly; I must point out though that our QA improved both through a bigger team of volunteers and better processes. >> >>> and it makes sense to make their role and their needs fairly >>> central. This has been raked over many times, and I'm not keen to >>> restart the debate here, but any serious consideration of the >>> implications would certainly highlight the importance of very >effective >>> QA on all released products. >> Sorry to have restarted it :-) you are putting your finger on >something >> important, which is how do we engage users. It is important to make >them >> feel welcome - because we want new contributors; at the same time we >> don't want to set false expectations, such as "users need to be >listened >> at, they need to say what they want as features in the software, how >it >> should be released, etc." ... because we are a Free Software project >and >> not a product. Products, even the ones based on Free Software, come >with >> customers, more or less paying for the product in one way or another. >> They have the right to complain, and anyone distributing that product >or >> making it has a responsibility to take their feedback rather >seriously. >> Free Software on the other hand is not a product and has no >> responsibility towards users beyond the rights conveyed by the >license. >We think the much the same about this. You have to contribute to >influence things. :-) >> >> But hey - thank you again for your input and your ideas, this is >useful >> and we're moving forward. > Editing the 'Send Feedback' page seems > independent of the other ideas > and, apart from making sure Cor is > sufficiently comfortable, is there > any reason for you not to go ahead with > those changes immediately? no reason at all :-) I will edit the page accordingly in the next 48 hours however in the future you may want to get edit rights on the website in the future if you wish to produce more content. best, Charles. >Other >changes can follow a later when we've had time to do a bit more >thinking. >Mike -- Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
