Le 10/06/2015 14:40, Cor Nouws a écrit : > So the challenge - where the issues are about - is to make working with > Styles more natural, visible.
Hi all, [Summary: style should be promoted by better answering user needs (several -new?- features proposed), not (only) by changing the ui] Here is a list of things we could add if we want to promote styles. Explaination of my reasonning after: - change management / training but probably out of scope. However, this is the root cause, i think. When you don't say how to use a software to users, they use it the way they think is good. - We should make an enhancement in Tools -> Options, it should be possible to reset the UI configuration of menu/tool/event/Sidebars to Basic, Normal, Advanced with 3 predefined configuration and ask at first launch which one to use. - we should, do all that is possible to promote meaningful styles over direct formatting. Taking into account this: when the name of the style is Bold and underline, that is not far from direct formatting style. Also, in writer, compare Addressee, Footer, Footer Left, Footer Right, Frame Contents, Header, Header Left, Header Right, and so on. There are (visually at least) all like Default style. I would do something that makes these styles different. I believe you have to visually excite your audience (in a certain limit) if you want to retain their attention. For exemple, Right formatting could be right formatted, we could use colours, tooltip on the style to better describe it. - we should have a tool / wizzard / whatever that helps you detect direct formatting and replace by existing / new styles. Kind of code style checking. Or fixing. - In writer context menus could allow to apply a style to current selection (text, paragrap, ...) - I believe that when a direct formatting is applied, a new style name could be automatically asked - It should be possible to send documents with locked (read-only) styles (I gave you a template with these styles, you cannot use other styles, you have no direct formatting, produce your part of the final document). Or: if you want a new style, it will be managed as a change request and document integrator will have two choices: accept it / replace it by an existing one. And now the origin of these features for those who still have few minutes: The software must not be developped for the developpers but for the target audience in order to answer needs. So, do we have an idea of the demographic composition of LO users ? Among users, how many are skilled in computer use and how many are users that have never been trained to "good practices" ? The second population will probably express its needs with a very limited vocabulary. I would say: text, new line (paragraph as advanced concept), bullets, bold, underline, italic, recover the text that I forgot to save, print. All other buttons are noise (at least at the very beginning, the more they learn, the more buttons should be displayed) If the guy is using LO at work, maybe one day, he will add titles and later images to the vocabulary. For this kind of population, I think one unique side panel is enough. You can present them a style named Bold and they will be happy. Kind of "basic" mode Among users, how many use LO for professional work / how many for private tasks ? The second population will be using LO to write a letter to an administration, to make a (one) slide with pictures of the last week-end activities just to print and paste in child's book. They will probably fall back in the previous "small-needs" category. Let's see the need of the first population (pro workers): they will be using LO for writing user manuals, answering tenders, writing letters to customers and so on. There is a (visual) quality expected for these documents especially if they are writen by several people. Now let's describe all the cases I met in this situation: - the guy (or the girl) has always used Word before and knows only direct style buttons (how many times did I see titles writen without styles, with tabs, spaces, numbers) - the guys uses Word and uses styles. But as soon as a part of a paragraph is bold, it's style + direct formatting, - the guys uses LO for first time, he used Word previously. He does not understand the (new for him) concept of Paragraph Style, Character Style, Table Style. He does not understand how to put numbers in front of titles (Chapter Numbering). Nobody proposed him at first launch to explain how to migrate ways of working from Word to LO. (kind of eLearning before / after). So, he uses few styles and lot of additional direct formatting. - the LO user. He uses styles and few direct formatting. My case: I tend to put images in writer, crop them, anchor as char, and apply Center. - the perfect user. Never met. - and finally the poor guy is charge of mixing all the contributions in a single document. He started a clean LO document, 5 styles in use. After copy / paste of all the contributions, he has 123434234 styles. There are 1000 pages. It is just a nightmare to stay with styles only. Even if it was his target. These use cases are real cases and so I think the feature describes above shoud help if we want to promote styles. To conclude (thanks for reading to the end): see summary :-) Philippe -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
