That makes sense, as long as we don't keep suggesting the same articles I think its fine.
*Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation M : +1 415 609 4043 | : @JaredZimmerman<https://twitter.com/JaredZimmerman> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Yuvi Panda <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jared Zimmerman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I thought Closer meant random+Geonearby >> > > Heh, I was just randomly making names up. Was not initially planning on > pushing this out wider than just May, but figured it'd be a good idea. > >> >> I'd recommend this isn't a button but a list— >> > > In the app, these won't be buttons, but 'pull up' actions - bullet point > #2 of > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia_App_Design#Page_1_:_Feed_me_more_knowledgeto > be exact. > > For related we use the Meow method, then switch to the Linky Method when >> the data exists. but always remove any pages that the user has seen this >> session (is that even possible?) >> > > Makes sense. And yes, possible in the app. > > Thoughts on the 'closer' method? It does tend to 'wander' less, but has an > annoying tendency to keep going back to the ISBN article. Perhaps start > with 'closer', but switch to linky when a duplicate is detected? > > -- > Yuvi Panda T > http://yuvi.in/blog >
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
