In which case why didn't we just push the changes with everything else? We must have seen some reason for them to keep out of the typography release... was there?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: James Forrester <[email protected]> Date: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:15 PM Subject: Re: [Design] Typography update leftovers To: "A list for the design team." <[email protected]> On 28 March 2014 16:58, Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since the typography update got pushed we are now left with > * Changes to the table of contents > * Changes to thumbnails > * A cleanup of external links. > > What should we do with these remaining changes? > We could either > 1) Package them into a single new beta feature > 2) Package each of them into individual beta features e.g. Vector > table of contents tweaks, Vector thumbnail tweaks, Vector external > links tweaks > 3) Submit each of these as patches to Gerrit (unless there are any complaints) > 4) Throw them away I think that the image changes should probably be a new BF ("Simpler images" or something), as it needs some thought about changing wikitext (and implementation for non-Vector skins). (Option 2) The TOC and external link changes should just be made as patches to Vector PDQ (Option 3); really it's going to be very confusing to add, remove, and then re-add these changes for users who are opted-in. J. -- James D. Forrester Product Manager, VisualEditor Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. [email protected] | @jdforrester _______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design -- Jon Robson * http://jonrobson.me.uk * https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson * @rakugojon _______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
