You can see how specific grays are being used here
<https://trello.com/c/IRqbu8p4/15-color-swatches>.




On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote:

> One thing at a time. We are building software and we can't get everything
> right first time :)
>
> I agree semantic names are what we should aim to but the purpose of the
> numeric colours was an attempt to at least stop introducing even more :)
>
> Sounds like we have identified disabledComponentGray to go with
> disabledTextGray during this process:)
>
> On 19 Aug 2014 16:32, "Jared Zimmerman" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > MZ we had that conversation already ;) we opted for semantic names for
> colors, and numerical names for our limited grey palette. The Living style
> guide will outline some uses for each grey but they will be divergent
> enough that a single name is not likely to make sense. If when we are
> building the color usage section of the living style guide we find enough
> commonality in usages for the shades of grey we can revisit semantic names.
> >
> >
> >
> > Jared Zimmerman  \\  Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation
>
> > M +1 415 609 4043 \\  @jaredzimmerman
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:21 PM, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Jared Zimmerman wrote:
> >> > I definitely think we should dim the text as well I think B works
> well,
> >> >we should just make sure we're using existing LESS greys for
> everything.
> >>
> >> I'd also argue that we need fewer grays. Surely fifteen grays is
> overkill.
> >>
> >> I think enumerating the grays was kind of a cop-out. We should be able
> to
> >> clearly define each gray, recognizing of course that naming is very
> >> difficult. If a gray and its purpose can't be clearly defined, it
> probably
> >> doesn't need to be part of the palette. For now, we can side-step the
> fact
> >> that most of these colors are indistinguishable on the hardware that
> many
> >> users use (both human eyes and computer monitors). :-)
> >>
> >> MZMcBride
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Design mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Design mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>
>
_______________________________________________
Design mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to