exactly. I think that we might be doing too much in the way of a value judgement. I consider a red ink a todo list, or request, not "something wrong" I know the opinions vary here but I'd rather us not swing too far into associating an emotion or value judgment on red links.
*Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia Foundation M +1 415 609 4043 \\ @jaredzimmerman <http://loo.ms/g0> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:04 PM, max <[email protected]> wrote: > @jared: > > I've got two points. > > 1. Hover isn't a thing we can rely on. Even desktop computers have touch > screens now. > 2.The colour red usually means that something's wrong (in our case: a page > doesn't exist yet), and so does the "!" icon. "Dotted Underline" on the > other hand has no meaning to it, it's super abstract. Users would have to > learn what it means by trial and error. > > -best, > max > @awesomephant > > _______________________________________________ > Design mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design > >
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
