Mimi Yin wrote:
First round, that's what I'm thinking - the groups exist on the server, there's no need for any sort of chandler-side management there. Groups are "Discovered" by the owner of some group saying "this is the url for this group" I don't think, in a small workgroup or small office, that more than one or two people really need to actually manage groups. Verbal "remote administration" is a totally reasonable first cut...I mean if you take our office for example, Philippe would just manage the apps group, and I might have my private, local-to-chandler groups as a part of my address book. If I want someone added to the group, I can just drop an e-mail to Philippe and say "Hey Reid says he's still not in the Apps group, can you add him?" and he can do so using the cosmo web admin interface. (In fact, I would argue that there should never be chandler-side management of groups beyond the address book - so either the address book's groups could sync with cosmo's groups, or a URL would be sent from cosmo to chandler, that chandler would launch to manage groups.) Alec
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
