It might be helpful to think about this in terms of specific scenarios:

+ Blue sends out an invite for the Company picnic:
+ Everyone "updates" the event with their attendance: I'm coming, I might come, I won't be coming.
+ You say how many people you'll be bringing.
+ Maybe it's a potluck, and in the "comments" section of the event, you write down what you're going to bring: soda, chips, cake, volleyball.

Looking at the e-vite model: it might be nice if instead of having to click on an URL to go to the evite on some server, you could just interact with the evite/event right in your email client?

In other words, the mental model is that the invitation information is simply meta-data attached to the event...all located conveniently together so that when you go look at the event on your calendar, you can see attendance information and comments all in one place.

=====

That being said, you are not the first person to draw a hard line between invitations and the events they refer to. Could you explain a little more about why that is? In what ways does conflating invitations and events get in the way of things you want to do? ie. I can't file them as separate items. I want to be able to send out several different/separate invitations for any given event. etc..

In this world, you could imagine modeling events and invitations as a cluster or thread of items. Or a thread of different "versions" of the same event...each a separate invitation.

Mimi


On Jan 25, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Alec Flett wrote:

Mimi Yin wrote:


If I stamp-as-email, address, then send to invite people to an event, how does inviting more people later work? I edit the existing email and hit send again? That's really different than what I'm used to, but I guess that could work. I suppose uninviting people could work the same
way...


Think of it as Edit and Update?
I think this has both technical and user-level issues.. but I think the user-level issues dominate. Personally I think edit-and-update is not a model that makes sense for invitations. This is also why I don't think stamping as a way of inviting makes any sense.

When I have a party, I send out invitations - be it via e-vite, paper cards, or whatever. and people reply to tell me they are coming, But the invitation is an entity unto itself - its sometimes a physical thing but ultimately it is an idea, a desire for someone to attend an event. I don't think of that as a modification to my party, or really even a modification to my original invitation. An invitation is just that: something that invites someone to an event. Its not the event itself. An invitation is something you send - it isn't a collaboration between the inviter and the invitee. I think that looking at it like stamping makes it sound like "I'm having a party in which one property is your attendance. If this isn't the correct definition of my party, please modify the event."

Anyway, that's my stamping-invitation 2 cents:)

Alec


** Probably out-of-scope for 0.7  **
(but I'll mention them briefly, anyway)

- Delegation (Esther organizes and/or schedules a meeting for Mitch).
This is part of iTIP, SWAG: 5 days
- Countering a meeting invitation with an alternate time (and accepting or declining counters). Part of iTIP. The message body for this is
easy, getting the UI right might be hard.  SWAG: 10 days

Well ideally, this would all be worked out in the item conversation, rather than all going back to the meeting organizer.

- Cancelling meetings.  Again, part of iTIP, easy, good UI isn't
necessary, although of course it would be nice to highlight
cancellations somehow, which might take more effort.  SWAG: 1 day
- Jabber transport for invitations (I really want to play with this,
maybe in my self-directed time), SWAG: Large
- "home time" free/busy vs. "work time".  For instance, if I go on
vacation for a week, I want family and friends to see a different
free/busy than coworkers.  I think figuring out how to do this would
probably be hard.

If you've gotten this far, that means you actually read the whole
message.  Congratulations, and thanks. :)

Have a nice night,
Jeffrey

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to