We could try that, my original concern with that was that it wouldn't
be clear what clicking a rabbit means. A check is used everywhere to
mean: Select me.
But maybe the added background treatment renders that concern
irrelevant. We'll have to see.
Mimi
On Feb 15, 2006, at 5:06 PM, Reid Ellis wrote:
ow about getting rid of the checkmarks altogether? e.g.
<pastedGraphic.tiff>
Reid
On Wed Feb 15 2006, at 13:58, Mimi Yin wrote:
I have put together 2 treatments of icons for the Sidebar
collection icons. The goal is to plop them into 2 different builds
and test them with users.
+ On top is a rounded "tongue" that slides out upon rollover.
+ Below is a highlight treatment which creates a "checkbox" area
on the left and highlights the entire row with the "color of the
calendar".
On the left: the collection - row is selected (with or without
focus, the collection icon will look the same).
On the right: the collection - row is not selected.
Issues that needed to be addressed:
+ Need a way to display collection-specific icons, so that users
can differentiate between People-based, Project-based, Date-based
collections, just to name a few.
+ Rollover effect is too subtle and some users I tested didn't
notice it or understand it to be "separate" from clicking on the row
+ Need to tie the various states together (Un-checked, Rollover,
Checked, etc) better, so that they're clearly related.
Mimi
<dotsevenSidebarStates_Test.png>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
