Mitchell Kapor wrote:
My initial reaction is that these designs all try to cram too many visual distinctions to represent the different nuances of event meta-data. I'd rather have a cleaner and more legible look even if it meant given up some of the nuances.

+1 - no matter how useful it is to have all this meta-data there's an aesthetic aspect as well - if just 5 events on my calendar make the UI very busy, then the app doesn't look fast and clean, it looks cluttered and hard to use. why can't we make use of mouseovers/tooltips/etc to show more detail? We're all oohing and aahhing over google's UI, and it is really simple...

oh, regarding the banner at the top - yes it's hard - not impossible of course. If that's what we need to make the UI usable, then we should spend the time.

Alec

On Apr 13, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:

http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/EventLozengeImprovements

So of course, just as I replied to matt saying that the @time and anytime lozenges wouldn't change very much, Mitch's email prompted me to have another go at the event lozenges in the calendar, which prompted me to draw a laundry list of all the pieces of meta-data that should/could go on the event lozenge...which turned out to be rather long.

Note: Apparently it is hard to draw the solid banner at the top of the event lozenge, which is why we didn't consider this design for 0.6 (a la iCal) (Alec, correct me if I'm wrong)

Mimi :o)

On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Mitchell Kapor wrote:

I'm now dogfooding 0.6.1. I've put away iCal, at least for a week. So far, so good, as they say. My assistant, Esther Sun, keeps my calendar, so my primary use case is frequently consulting it to see what I have to do next, what the current day is like , or how busy is a specified interval in the future. I have a fairly full calendar and it is not unusual to have 4 or 5 consecutive appointments of 30 or 60 minutes duration each.

The visual separation between multiple consecutive events is not up to par. The problem is that it's hard to tell where one event ends and the next begins. The shape of each event is rectangular on the left side and nearly so on the right, with only a very small curved cut-out at the top and bottom edge. I think it would really help if the event "lozenge" was actually more lozenge-shaped so that a series of consecutive events would read more as a set of oval lozenges stacked on top of one another rather than a stack of slightly defective legos._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to