On 4/20/06, Sheila Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically Scooby timezone support, as we implement it,
> needs to move in lock-step with Scooby for most issues. We do understand
> however that there are subtle differences in the way we need to handle
> certain things (storing defaults, persisting info across sessions) and these
> need to be discussed.

assuming that you mean "move in lock-step with chandler" - you could
solve this problem within the constraints you've layed down by making
chandler save the chosen timezone (if any) as the caldav timezone for
a calendar when chandler shares/syncs the calendar. then scooby could
basically not worry about timezones at all, because cosmo would always
give its data back to scooby in terms of the timezone stored with the
calendar (or floating, if the user never selected a timezone in
chandler).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to