On Aug 30, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
After speaking with Priscilla, I wanted to clarify something about
the Optional Password Proposal: http://lists.osafoundation.org/
pipermail/design/2006-August/005275.html
If the sharee signs up for a Cosmo Account, how difficult is it for
us to store the Collection Password with the Account? I realized I
was assuming that sharees wouldn't need to enter the password if
they login with an account, but that wasn't made explicit in the
write-up.
I'll defer to Brian or Bobby on the difficulty of storing collection
passwords with accounts.
I do have a different question though. My use of Chandler involves
me running the desktop client to update my calendar and then sharing
those calendars via iCal. I have two iCal scenarios.
1. Julie is using iCal as her calendar at home and I want her to view
my work calendar so that she knows when I have phone calls scheduled.
2. I subscribe to all my Calendars in iCal because iCal can sync my
calendars to my phone.
What happens to clients like iCal, etc if we password protect
collections or if we require accounts in order to access calendar
collections?
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design