On 12/5/06, Jared Rhine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In previous performance testing, the times I observed for ATOM GET and webcal GET were identical within a couple percent. I assumed that the code paths were pretty similar (iterate over all events in a collection, serialize each into a string, and concatenate). As you understand the codepaths better, can you see a situation where one of these would slow down but the other one wouldn't (on a loaded server)?
the code paths are fairly different, but you're right, the basics are the same. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
