Room change: Gotham
Tel# 1.800.391.1709
bridge# 960052
I might be projecting on display 0 (if I can get this thing to
project from this room)
Thanks, -Priscilla
On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
Tomorrow, Tuesday Dec 5th we will be having a design session from
2:30-4PM PST in Whoville to discuss the nice-to-have Cosmo UI for
Preview proposal we sent out a few weeks ago.
Goal: We'd like to kick off an iterative process to finalize plans
for Preview. PPD has come up with Nice-to-have design proposals and
Bare Minimum design proposals. We would like feedback and input
from Engineering as to how feasible these proposals are so that we
can iterate and turn out a more refined proposal that take into
account resource and scheduling limitations.
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/
NiceToHaveProposalsForPreviewCosmoUI http://wiki.osafoundation.org/
bin/view/Journal/StrawpersonProposalForMinimumPreviewCosmoUIElements
Agenda
+ (15 min) Review the proposed designs.
+ (10 min) Review the feature list for the designs and fill in gaps.
+ (10 min) Identify red flags.
+ (45 min) SWAG individual features with stickies
+ (5 min) Next actions
Mimi :o)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Priscilla Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: November 17, 2006 12:08:04 PM PST
To: OSAF Design List <[email protected]>, Matthew Eernisse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Design] [Cosmo] Cosmo UI for Preview and Post Preview
PLEASE REVIEW BEFORE DECEMBER
Please download the .ppt slides:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/pub/Journal/
NiceToHaveProposalsForPreviewCosmoUI/CosmoUIChrome_NTH.ppt
or the .pdf files (listed in the wiki page) as a slide show to
review the designs we've been iterating for Cosmo UI in Preview
and post Preview.
We're throwing out these proposals with the knowledge that it's
too much to accomplish in the short amount of time we have left.
However, we wanted to provide a high level picture of where we
might be headed post-Preview, while staying within the confines of
the Casual Collaborator workflows we've identified for Preview.
Some question we have for you are:
+ Are there things in here that we need to address sooner rather
than later because they affect 0.6 development in some way.
+ Do you see any major issues with the proposals?
We've also tried to list out all the features for Preview. This
list is compiled from a design perspective, so we will need help
from Engineering to fill it out to reflect all the features that
will need to be implemented to support the UI.
Wiki page:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/
NiceToHaveProposalsForPreviewCosmoUI
NEXT ACTIONS
Our next course of action is to review this as a group in early
December. We'd like to understand what features are possible,
what's really hard, what's trivial. We will then go back and come
up with another proposal based on the feedback, but then it would
be good to come up with a coherent set to map on a stickie plan.
ADDITIONAL/BACKGROUND INFO.
Please also note we did some design explorations in terms of
prioritizing the 'nice to have features'. Here are the wiki pages
that describe the bare minimum proposal for Preview:
Bare Bones UI proposal
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/
StrawpersonProposalForMinimumPreviewCosmoUIElements
More details about Simplified Dashboard proposal
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/
StrawpersonProposalForSimplifiedCosmoDashboard
Initial explorations for the Nice-to-have proposals. Purely for to
see how we've been iterating:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/
DraftMockUpsForListView
OK. There is a lot here, so just list out some open issues if you
have any on the wiki page and we'll go over them in December.
Thanks, -Priscilla
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
