Okay, this is a bigger discussion then.
On Jan 17, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
On 1/17/07, Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My understanding from the spec review was that it was overkill to
provide
this feature, as filesharing via the 'Account Browser' was not a
long-term
goal for Cosmo / SNARF users. But, I may have misinterpreted bcm's
comment.
Brian?
you're right. if i can get you guys to agree to add ticket
creation/deletion to the pim's list view, or somewhere else, then i
think the account browser becomes a diagnostic tool, not any user's
primary focus.
This depends on which user you're talking about. The end-user Casual
Collaborator? or the Filesharer?
Are you talking about the SNARF / standalone web calendar client
user? e.g. The professor who is sharing his class calendar with his
own instance of Cosmo and Cosmo UI and needs to issue and revoke
tickets?
I think this is someone we hadn't talked about until the spec review
last week.
If this user is primarily interested in using Cosmo as a personal web
calendar sharing tool, would they need to have an option to log
directly into their account browser? Or is it enough to just provide
a link to access the account browser from the end-user PIM UI?
It seems like if issuing and revoking tickets is the functionality in
question, it's not an oft-repeated user task and wouldn't merit
adding an option to always log in to the account browser.
Mimi
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
