On Apr 9, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
On 4/9/07, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure where this came from. Performance testing is not a
goal of
Cosmo 0.6.1. We have no plans to do any performance work until
Cosmo 0.7.
maybe not ui performance testing, but sync performance is arguably the
#1 goal of 0.6.1, so i hope that's addressed in a test plan.
You'll notice that all the stuff in the posted plan was UI testing.
We don't have a serious perf test plan for syncing. I'm not even
sure that we can get a baseline versus the tests that Jared used
before, since his tests were DAV based. At the moment the test plan
is mostly "Is Chandler wall clock time shorter?". We do need
something more comprehensive than that for 0.7, but for now, it's
more important that it work correctly. I know that I am just
assuming (perhaps wrongly) that it will be faster.
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
