Hi, see below...

On Apr 25, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Priscilla Chung wrote:

I'd like to encourage you update the latest revision on the spec so every one knows there's only one place they will need to go to see the latest and greatest. I've been displaying it in reverse chronicle order and adding dates before the mock up so everyone would know when the mock up was created. Hopefully to lessen the confusion.


Sure thing.

2. Toned down the pulldown menus to be just 'Text + Arrows' (like Apple iCal). I was wondering if the boxed pulldowns would look strange in the Detail View next to the other platform specific field elements, like checkboxes and radio buttons.
Agreed. Speaking of iCal, I was thinking we should review tomorrow about unfocused input form fields to have a 1 px border and put focus on live input fields which would have an indent. As I start at this more, the problem lies that there is just a lot of information in the detail view and you don't know where you are when filling out the form fields.

Yup


In addition, I understand the arguments for hiding information in a two item drop down list, but if the AM/PM radio buttons are taking too much space, an argument could be made about saving space in the detail view will also help visibility. Besides it is common on a lot of (travel) web sites to see AM/PM in a drop down list. I'll add this item to tomorrow's meeting agenda.

Yup, I think people are familiar enough with AM/PM that they will be able to deduce PM when they see AM ;o)


This freed up a lot of space in the DV and allowed me to move the fields around so that the fields can be more conventionally laid out.
So I'm not sure, but I have a feeling when I meant we may be able to customize the drop down list, it would just mean there is a 1 pixel outline of a flat form field box and the usual arrow pointing downwards. I mean this may be something we want to aim to do at some point, but it might not be possible by preview for the following reasons: 1. My understanding is that the custom drop down list was not a high priority vs. all the other items Matthew has on his list. He's reusing some code which he had wrote up from before and to create a drop down based on your mock up may mean more tweaking and time in the schedule which is beyond preview. Perhaps the first stage for preview is to just have a flat drop down list and then move for something more subtle.

Okay, wasn't sure what was easy to customize (border / no border) and what wasn't.

2. I'm not sure if having the double arrows is a convention on the web besides Apple applications. Does anyone have a screen shot of mac mail on the web? Let me look into that.

Not stuck on the double arrows. Just looks nicer to my eye than one big down arrow.

3. My last concern is make sure users are able to tab into the drop down list. Currently if I'm proposing to have a live input fields to have indents, I wonder if it will look odd when tabbing throughout the web app from something that doesn't look editable to an indented editable field. I realize iCal/Address book on the mac does this, however they are only focused in the detail view and not tabbing throughout the web app. ie. the go to date field, to the quick item entry box, to the subscription drop down list, to the detail view. Does that make sense?

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by having indents. I think the arrows are the visual clue that the field is editable?


One last note on focus, maybe we can propose some thing where there is a focus area in the three pane. For example when you are looking at the dashboard, the left nav and the detail view is slightly grayed out—a very subtle grey so it's not looking like everything is disabled. We can experiment on this, but the point is to give focus on the area you're working in. If the user clicks off to one of the other panes, then there is a transition in the focus.

Okay, I think you can do this also do this by changing the highlight effect, dimming it essentially.

3. Stacked the From and To columns into a single Who column. Added dividers to divide up the rows.
I was going to ask about that. Did you ever think about candy stripes on the dashboard for the desktop? I realize they don't have this in some e-mail applications, but I was just curious on your past experience. The dividers are a good idea, but are very faint to the extent that I could barely see it on my laptop. We'll experiment on this some more.

Yup. The dividers aren't meant to be 'seen' so much as 'felt' if that makes any sense. But cand stripes are fine too. I was just thinking ahead to if/when we ever want to use color highlighting to denote things like clusters and/or threads, so I've been avoiding them on the desktop.


+ What will our heuristics be for when to display 1 versus 2 rows per item?
+ Does it always hinge on the Who column?
+ If there are no Who attributes to display, do we always display 1 row, even if the Title could potentially wrap onto 2 rows?
I guess I was originally thinking it would display two rows. Hmmm… maybe we need to see if there would be too much space if it's always two rows. Probably need to check with Matthew if it would be possible to alternate depending on the content.

Yea, it might look weird if there are extra rows with no data in them.


One more thing I noticed, Matthew can confirm this, but I don't think he'll be able to implement ellipses

Okay. I thought it had to do with 'smart ellipses' versus 'dumb ellipses'. As in we can ellipse text after a certain number of characters and not try to be smart about filling out the available space perfectly.


4. Added the mini-cal sidebar back in.
+ Do we need a [Go] button next to the 'Go to' widget?
Probably until we decide not to show the 'go to date' on the web UI and make it as part of a keyboard short cut (there are no definite plans on this, but just something that is consistent in other calendaring app including the desktop). We may need to also add a '+' or some type of 'add' button at the end of quick item entry. I know we had this conversation before about it being similar to the 'go' button in a address bar in the browser. It seems for now, since there isn't a lot of keyboard support on the web UI, there may be a need to have that visual cue for users—even if it muddles the visual cleanliness.

Is this something we could try? Leave the button out and see if people are able to figure it out?

+ Will selecting a week in the mini-cal do anything when the user is in the Dashboard view?
This was a question I had originally which I forgot to jot down in the open issues. In addition, would entering a date on the 'go to date' automatically jump back to calendar view? Or would we be able to add some visual cue in the mini cal? Best separate this as a question & proposal on the design list.

Yea, d-clicking in the mini-cal also takes you to the calendar app area on the desktop.


5. Added a very subtle light grey background to the DV to set it off from the rest of the UI.
Oh, I don't see the subtle grey in the detail view, but this is probably what I was mentioning above.

Yea, again something that's felt rather than seen. It's more obvious if you can look at it with and without the grey. I can show you when I'm back in the office, or make an animated gif.

Thx,

Mimi :o)



_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to