Morgen and I would like to propose punting the 'Never share' feature
to Future. At this point, Morgen still needs to do extra work to
model the lock feature in EIM (see fwd'ed thread below) and I'm not
sure it's worth the trouble for Preview.
Has anyone used this feature while dogfooding? Can we easily remove
the icon from the mark-up bar? Reid?
Mimi
Begin forwarded message:
From: Morgen Sagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: April 27, 2007 7:09:04 AM PDT
To: Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Sheila Mooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: the lock button on the detail view
I am all for punting it for now if you don't think it's important.
Any little feature like this just adds to the complexity of things.
On Apr 27, 2007, at 1:04 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:
So if this is at all a hassle to get right for Preview, should we
consider punting it to Future?
Lock means 'Never share'. Which is fine if you lock it before you
share the item. But what happens if you lock it after the fact?
Do we remove it from the server? What if you weren't the person to
put it up there? I think we just stop syncing changes on that
item, inbound or outbound, including deletes and removals by other
people who have the item.
Does that sound reasonable?
Mimi
On Apr 26, 2007, at 9:50 PM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
So I recently realized that I hadn't implemented anything related
to the "lock" icon in EIM based sharing. But when I sat down to
work on it tonight, I wasn't actually sure what it should do.
Does that lock mean inbound changes are not applied to the item?
Does it mean no local changes for the item are sent to the server?
If someone removes that item from the collection on the server,
does that affect what collections the "locked" item is in in your
Chandler?
Thanks,
~morgen
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
