Hi Mimi, >> If the rule changed (like an occurrence was deleted, the frequency >> changed, or the series' end-date changes), removing occurrences with >> local changes. In this case, we create a local "orphan", a normal >> not-recurring item separate from the original rule with a pending >> deletion. > > Just to clarify, if the pending deletion is rejected, the recurrence > rule change is *not* rejected as well, thereby restoring the orphaned > occurrences back into the original recurring series. > > Do the items still in the recurring series register some kind of > conflict over the recurrence rule?
There is no connection between the new orphan and the old recurring series, so if you reject the pending deletion on the orphan, you, and everyone you're sharing with, will see it as just a single, non-recurring item. This is less than ideal, but it doesn't seem especially common and it was the best we could do at this stage of the game. Sincerely, Jeffrey _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
