PRE-PREVIEW USER FEEDBACK
Katie logged and summarized results of KEI test session. Biggest
takeaways were that we have some sharp corners to smooth out so that
the start-up Chandler experience is smoother, particular in the areas
of 'sending out sharing invitations' and 'subscribing to shares in
Chandler Hub'.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-August/007567.html
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-August/007568.html
We got lots of great dogfood feedback from Robin Cortiss. Robin came
with a lot of good feedback covering a wide range of issues from
Dashboard / Triage behaviors to Calendaring and Mini-caledaring and
data display issues. The discussion around issues Robin brought up
are still being worked out on the list.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-August/007569.html
Robin also followed up with 2 separate mails of feature requests
including: Ability to define behavior for collections, date picker,
more snooze options, more recurrence options, etc.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-August/007583.html
Jeffrey and Andre started a thread about the possibility of
automatically 'unstamping' messages that are dragged into Chandler
via Chandler's special IMAP folders. There is ongoing debate about
whether there are compelling use cases for keeping the message stamp
on those items.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-August/007580.html
Dan pointed out that the Reload dialog was confusing and proposed an
alternative wording. Mimi proposed yet another alternative to Dan's
alternative. The issue is as yet unresolved.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-August/007583.html
Aparna proposed that we give more support to 'Restore Published
Shares' and make it more accessible to end-users, given that it is an
oft-used data recovery tool. There was a lot of support for the
proposal. Mimi asked if it was possible to make 'Restore Published
Shares' happen automatically upon entering one's sharing account
information. Still waiting for a 'technical' response from Morgen?
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-September/
007597.html
PLANNING
Mimi responded to Katie's dev-list posting: What is next for Chandler
desktop? with a cross-project (desktop+server) framing of how we
might approach planning for 1.0. Asking for feedback on proposed
framing and additions to the list of 1.0 design issues.
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-September/
007611.html
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
