Not sure if this is on target, but I ran into another place where we might want to beef up EIM-smarts.

Grouping pending changes by 'user'. When updating the byline, it would be good to figure out if an user's changes had actually been applied before reflecting that they had 'edited' or 'updated' an item.

I believe I had an item that claimed to have been updated by Reid, but in actuality, none of Reid's edits had been applied, they were all sitting waiting to be applied in the Pending Changes dialog.

For more details, see: https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/ show_bug.cgi?id=10730

Mimi

On Sep 17, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Grant Baillie wrote:

On 17 Sep, 2007, at 14:53, Mimi Yin wrote:

The second EIM - end-user modeling issue has to do with relationships between attributes.

2. There are dependencies between end-user attributes that aren't reflected in EIM. One example of where this is a problem is:

+ User A changes the end-date on a recurring event which results in the deletion of the last 3 occurrences. + User B syncs and sees a pending change to 'delete' the last 3 occurrences. + If/when user B discards that pending change, the 3 occurrences are simply left as 'orphan' events.

There's currently no way to 'rewind' so-to-speak and 'undo' the end-date change and restore the last 3 occurrences as members of the recurring series.

Morgen, Jeffrey, Grant? Do I have this right? Are there other examples?

That sounds right to me. Another example of this kind of dependence, which is an attribute affecting the existence of entire items, changing the recurrence interval.

I sometimes wonder, in cases like these, if we should just make RDATEs for any to-be-removed events that contain user changes (i.e. are modifications, in our recurrence parlance).

--Grant

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to