>From the feedback, it sounds to me like merely having the Desktop and Hub collection order be in sync in advance of providing a tool to users on either end or both to change the order is occurring as net-negative for more people than net-positive. The approach behind my suggestion was to advance the functionality in small increments. Seems like though that this may not be the best next small step in this area.
Andre On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:28:29 -0800, "Philippe Bossut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Mimi Yin wrote: > > Phiippe said: > >> Hmm... What would that order be in the use case I presented? Again, > >> my Hub and Desktop do not have the same set of collections. > > > > I wrote up an ordering proposal > > here: > > http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/design/2007-November/007800.html > > OK so, in my case and according to your proposal, I would get (from my > Hub): > - Perso > - 0.7.x Schedule > - Work > - RC Test > - Cosmo > > and a list of local collections I guess... Not sure where the subscribed > collections will fall in that proposal. Where will they fit? I > subscribed to them using tickets and they are all on different accounts. > > Needless to say, this is not a very useful ordering. Not worse but as > useless as the one I have on my Desktop machine. The fact that it is > consistently useless is of little solace I'm afraid... I mean, it's not > addressing any of the problems I have with collection ordering. > > At the very least, if we go with this "sync collection order between Hub > and Desktop" idea, we need to give to the user a way to reorder > collections on the Hub. Something in the account browser would work for > me. > > Cheers, > - Philippe > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
