Hi Jared,
Currently, the proposal is to provide separate instructions for iCal
2.x and iCal 3.x
http://chandlerproject.org/Notes/HubDialogRehaul
So this seems like another good reason to go with that design?
Mimi
On Nov 19, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Jared Rhine wrote:
As an annoying twist, it's worth mentioning that technically, the
iCal 2.x and iCal 3.x URLs are different. They are both webcal
URLs, but on Hub, iCal 3.x supports SSL webcal while iCal 2.x does
not. So technically, one has "https://hub..."; while the other has
"http://hub...";.
Technically, we can use just the HTTP version for both. But it'd
be nice to encourage SSL where possible, and iCal 3.x webcal is one
place where it does work.
-- Jared
_______________________________________________
cosmo-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-dev
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
