Hi Davor,

I think this is one of the issues having to do with being able to distinguish between 'sharing with yourself' and 'sharing with others'.
https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8928

We've already started to make progress on this issue with automatically restoring published shares. But I think the one you're describing might be especially hard to solve well.

1. We need to be able say that when an user sets up the same sharing account on multiple machines, ALL attributes should be shared, regardless of any 'sharing filters' have been set. 2. We also need to be able to reconcile our Read/Unread status with IMAP Read/Unread status. 3. If you've set up POP accounts, we can't do anything *unless* the POP messages are also shared.

The mixture of email/sharing will always make this slightly confusing. Some Unread/Read status will get synced across machines. Others won't.

Morgen? Do you have any thoughts on this?

Mimi

On Dec 1, 2007, at 9:51 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:

I use Chandler on two different machines, but use the same server
account to sync collections between the two. Every time I sync on
either machine, I end up with a whole bunch of "unread" items that were
edited on the other computer. I am beginning to wonder if it makes
sense to show these as unread at all, since it is the same person
(i.e., the same Cosmo account) making the changes.

Does anyone else run into this? It's not a bug, but a wrinkle in the
existing design that makes my workflow more awkward than it needs to
be, and I'd like to see how common it is before filing a request on
Bugzilla.

Davor
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to