Ok, but that will be a 2.22 feature I pressume. Cheers, Mikkel
2007/10/9, Sebastian Pölsterl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen schrieb: > > 2007/9/29, Sebastian Pölsterl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen schrieb: > >>> Hmm... I think it is a difference in how the Match/Action relation is > >>> understood that is the root of my confusion. > >>> > >>> My idea was that Actions was extra functionality you could add to a > >> match, > >>> while I understand from your explanation that a match with a set of > >> actions > >>> is merely a placeholder for those actions... > >>> > >> The match in 2.20 has nothing to do with the match in <= 2.18. In 2.20 > >> the match is just a placeholder for the object that the module has > >> found. A match without actions added to it does actually nothing. > >> However, the 2.20 actions is very similar to the <= 2.18 match. > >> > >>> Showing the default actions makes sense in from my view, but from your > >> view > >>> (as I understand it) I guess it makes sense to display something else. > >>> > >> It makes sense when only one action is available. The question is if a > >> match has more than one actions, should we display the description of > >> the default action or the name of the match? > > > > > > Hmmm, I'm not really sure what the right solution is. The ultimate goal > is > > of course to display the most useful and relevant information to the > user. > > How the API looks underneath should not govern what reaches the user. > > > > I still think I would display the default action. After all you still > have > > the arrow to indicate that there are other possibilities. It's just a > hunch > > though, I'm not really sure... > > > After thinking about it for a while I think it's the best to show the > the description of the default action at all time. Therefore, > Match.get_name() is not needed anymore. > > - -- > Greetings, > Sebastian Pölsterl > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHC4eB1ygZeJ3lLIcRAnxIAKCS8EwIJyHZWxP5wVHS4ft0nHc+EACfXuzk > Miyx9gcCSgkzC5pXbxUyCeY= > =OyUq > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
_______________________________________________ deskbar-applet-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/deskbar-applet-list
