dAniel hAhler spake thusly:
> I've asked on #ubuntu-devel about whether we should provide the stable
> release through -updates or -backports.
> The consensus has been that there should be a list of high-impact (SRU-able)
> bugs and only those should then get addressed.
> "Having a release candidate is not professional" is apparently no argument
> really.
That's *not* what he said. It's not a "release candidate", it's a
"release conadidate". Please re--read. What do you suppose the devs
would think of a "Release Conadidate"? I think it's rather
unprofessional (not unlike "dAniel hAhler" vs "Daniel Hahler".....).
--
Scott
http://angrykeyboarder.com
I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like.
©2007 angrykeyboarder™ & Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved
--
gimp 2.4 *final* in gutsy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
