Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > Emilio, someone who is (rightly) alarmed when we call software "bad" > would be even more alarmed if we called it "unstable" AND "bad". So no, > that wouldn't solve the problem, it would make it worse. :-)
heh, right. Perhaps the same but removing bad/ugly/good. Although I doubt that will be any better than it is now, as a user will be as (or more) alarmed if he sees unstable (or experimental) than if he sees bad or ugly. Non-free sounds like a good replacement for ugly. good doesn't need to be replaced at all. But for bad... what about "not-so-good"? :) -- Installing codecs exposes "bad" and "ugly" terminology https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146167 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gstreamer0.10 in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
