Does this really make sense ? it's tagged as "need-i386-retrace", you wrote that "automatic retracer will pick it up and do a stacktrace", so stop sending (non-useful) info until then. a month later you post that your closing it because it needs more info ? and it's still tagged as needing i386-retrace. do you want me to do the i386-retrace, and the stacktrace since your automatic system did not ? closing this bug, basically does not fix the bug, that is in a final product. what' s up with the auto-system ?, I know sometimes the auto-stuff does not get a valid-useable result, but was it even tried here ? I would ask "what commands do I need to run for you'all" but, that hard drive is not connected on this computer right now, so I probably could not give much further info anyway. It just sounds like there is a jumping of the gun to close the bug as Invalid, when it should probably marked as Incomplete at least. Both labels make it sound like I did something wrong or just bug dumped, but that is another thing altogether. Maybe it doesn't matter, the final product is out already out, maybe it's been fixed already, maybe somebody loaded this on there friend's computer to show them how cool ubuntu is, and for them to try it and this bug came up. Or maybe not.
-- gnome-vfs-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in _dl_fixup() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
