Thought these were the original? (shadows)
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php?content=31261
http://www.gnome-look.org/content/pre1/31261-1.jpg
I could be wrong but it sure looks like it to me, but I stopped following the 
project because of the bad shadows and broken freedesktop standard.

Like I said, I quickly did the above mods. I've since made them even more like 
the original. It's nice that so many people are not bothered by thes bad 
shadows, but they are also not bothered by bad gtk and metacity themes. Shall 
we include a few of those in ubuntu?

To get an outside, unbiased opinion, I asked 3 graphics/print/design 
professionals (I hit about 20 graphic businesses a day and worked in one for 3 
years) today what they thought of tango/tangerine. Two laughed and one smerked. 
Two asked what was up with the shadows, one of them did so immediately. This 
was exactly what I thought would happen.

I then showed them my screenie posted above. They said they were much better, 
but still weak. This was exactly what I thought they'd say, based on my 
experience it is what i see as well.

I thought Jacob was helping you? I thought this was your project? It doesn't 
make a lot of diff to me as I prefer Human if I want orange. I just thought I 
give an themer's opinion to save embarrassment on linux/ubuntu. People say 
...."oh it'll be compared to Vista" (don't even think of mac), but not at this 
slow rate, and excuses of incompetent tools and no free time from those that 
start a project. 

continue on if you find the time.....I'll stop wasting my mine here.

bvc

-- 
unrealistic shadows
https://launchpad.net/bugs/40259

--
desktop-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Reply via email to