I'll also confirm. Another thing to add, if you change the search folder options affecting threads, the accuracy of the count gets more incorrect each time you change it the thread options. I changed these options three times, and the count went from an inaccurate count of 16 unread 17 read to something in the 70's, growing each time.
This problem is new to me since the 8.10 upgrade. -- Search folders have the wrong Unread count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 27 20:42:15 2008 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:42:15 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx204.postini.com ([64.18.0.63] helo=psmtp.com) by mail-archive.com with smtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1L5vBH-0006bv-48 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:42:15 -0800 Received: from source ([91.189.94.204]) by exprod5mx204.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:42:13 PST Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1L5vBD-00030w-3g; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:42:11 +0000 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1L5vBB-00030m-Le for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:42:09 +0000 Received: from forster.canonical.com ([91.189.90.190]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 #1 (Debian)) id 1L5vBB-0000Kq-Jt for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:42:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=forster.canonical.com) by forster.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1L5vBB-00067z-Eo for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:42:09 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: McBLG97 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:34:46 -0000 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [Bug 291881] Re: Search folders have the wrong Unread count X-Launchpad-Bug: product=evolution; status=Unknown; importance=Unknown; assignee=None; X-Launchpad-Bug: distribution=ubuntu; sourcepackage=evolution; component=main; status=Triaged; importance=Low; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; X-Launchpad-Bug-Private: no X-Launchpad-Bug-Security-Vulnerability: no X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Subscriber (Ubuntu) @ubuntu-bugs Precedence: bulk X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="None"; Instance="initZopeless config overlay" X-Launchpad-Hash: 871a8fe5dc5f37f4aa22bd3c0c6f1a71be3b18d0 X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Reply-To: Bug 291881 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: Ubuntu bug tracker changes - HIGH VOLUME <ubuntu-bugs.lists.ubuntu.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-neptune: 0/0/0.00/0 X-pstn-levels: (S:83.27515/99.90000 CV:99.9999 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0282 C:98.6951 ) X-pstn-settings: 4 (1.5000:1.5000) s cv gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] I'll also confirm. Another thing to add, if you change the search folder options affecting threads, the accuracy of the count gets more incorrect each time you change it the thread options. I changed these options three times, and the count went from an inaccurate count of 16 unread 17 read to something in the 70's, growing each time. This problem is new to me since the 8.10 upgrade. -- Search folders have the wrong Unread count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
