That's not an argument! How in the world could "Rock/Pop" be more useful in terms of identification than the _name of the person who is going to be singing to you_ ??!! If it is still included, why should it be given such priority? - at least move it! And why would it be "Unknown" - it is my library, this is all the music I added, I know what I'm listening to. I don't think that's an appropriate example.
As I mentioned upstream: "It's because the genre information doesn't directly pertain specifically to the song. It's an issue of order of importance. Title-Artist-Album-Genre is descending in terms of importance. Title-Genre-Artist-Album doesn't have any order - it is nonsensical." Ex, iTunes: http://www.theater-pro.com/content/images/itunes.jpg I think that the funniest thing about this is that even on their OWN screenshots page, they have changed the default behaviour because it is so stupid and ugly: http://projects.gnome.org/rhythmbox/screenshots/rb- auto-playlist.png I'm surprised there is actually resistance to this. -- Genre should not be Enabled by Default or Moved https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
