My bug #921689 was just automatically marked as a duplicate of this one by the "apport retracing service". I just wanted to check whether that is actually correct, as my crash has a different stack trace:
StacktraceTop: raise () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 abort () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 __assert_fail () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 _XAllocID () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6 XRenderCreateCursor () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libXrender.so.1 It occurred in XRenderCreateCursor(), not in XCreatePixmap(). Should I leave it as a duplicate? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905686 Title: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/xlibs/+bug/905686/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
